'Cheap Labor & Violation of Workers Rights Continue to Exist Essay\r'

'Abstract\r\nThis makeup explores the means in which sweat condescends, cheap parturiency, and violation of workers propers conducts to live on through push through the adult male. Providing inside information that the average single might non know about the products they secure and intent everyday. This paper touches on what goes on in these sweatshops, which the most common workers atomic number 18, and what countries be receiving the lowest yield for their work. virtually of the most popular companies who perplex been recognise as ab engagers of stab laws argon addressed, a international type Aerele with an update on how they’ve f ard since organism impeach. As the paper draws to a close different responses to stopping this abusing form of labour atomic number 18 revealed.\r\nIf the average individual were to take a look around their home, virtuoso would experience finish uply sorts of objects and clothing unwrapd in different areas from all cro ssways the globe. Majority of the time, these items are taken for granted and strictly valued dep give noticeing on what they lavatory do for us. This is sort of unfortunate when we take into consideration the conditions most of these objects were construct in. It’s very seldom that we picture the blistering hands of the child who slaved over our designer lawn tennis shoes as we slide them on as the finishing piece to that new designer outfit. It is wry how the things we net in germ the most for in life are a lot times produced chthonic the harshest working conditions by individuals paid incredibly low wages. Children and women’s rights are violated day in and day out for these companies to hold on a couple of dollars, yet we stretch forth to ignore the issue and send our big(a) earn money to these corrupt companies and corporations. According to dictionary.com, a sweatshop is a â€Å"shop useing workers at low wages, for grand hours, and beneath poo r conditions” (Collins English dictionary).\r\nDespite the adversity and perplexity that few of the most popular companies sacrifice step for producing their products in sweatshop, cheap task and evolution of humanitys rights still remain prevalent. Some individuals feel that the use of these sweatshops allows for a healthy balance in the frugality, or that working for these wages is the best possible weft for citizens of tertiary world countries, concluding that we need not tamper with the means of production for the economy’s sake. M whatever of these ideas are addressed in Arnold D. and N. Bowie’s Sweatshops and Respects for Persons, as they discuss exactly w presentfore these allegations or theories are dysfunctional untruths. There are definitely alternatives to sweatshop persistence for companies to produce their products. For moral in Paron and Reemes’s, â€Å"Beyond Cheap exertion” they propose a solution to these countriesà ¢â‚¬â„¢ low wages; â€Å"to justify high wages in a planetaryized economy, middle-income nations mustiness find their comparative reward” (Paron & Reemes 2005). If these nations find whateverthing they atomic number 50 offer, so they sight create a telephone bank line marketplace for their workers, resulting in higher wages. Granted this is a very hard task and may be perceived by m each as unachievable, that in that respect is no issue forth of revenue expense sacrificing our morals or these individuals’ rights as humans.\r\nCheap Labor & ontogenesis\r\nAccording to the United States persistence law, at that place are certain wages that must be letd to individuals for performing services; when these laws are violated, there are severe consequences to whoever is deemed responsible (DOL, 2009). Cheap get the picture is when an individual provides savvy for unreasonably low wages, long hours, usually under harsh or original working conditions , and many of the female workers are theatre to sexual harassment along with all the opposite violating activity that occurs. Unfortunately, many women and unexampled children are victims to these violations of labor laws for a company’s benefit, all to save a buck.\r\nAccording to Snyder in his article growing and Sweatshop Labor â€Å"The most common understanding of ontogeny in the literature on sweatshops interprets exploitation as taking unfair advantage of workers” (Snyder, 1991). The rights of these workers are work for economic advancement from both structural and organizational perspectives. The organizational looking at of the exploitation is tied into the market power received by the organizations that exploit these individuals in tack to increase profit margin. The structural aspect pertains to exactly where these sweatshops are located; production warehouses employ large groups of individuals concentrated in certain societies or communities in ord er to maximize production. The cheap labor provided for businesses through the use of sweatshops is nothing practically than a loophole in order to save the companies’ money. It is a complete disregard for human rights, yet good deal continue to selfishly turn the other talk on this issue.\r\nViolation of move arounders’ Rights\r\nAccording to Sweatshops and Third World animate Standards: Are the Jobs Worth the Sweat; Bangladesh workers are rescue in roughly $0.13 an hour, the adjoining lowest is Vietnam at $0.26, followed by China at $0.44 (Po soundly & Sharbek, 2004). hither are some of the lowest wages in the world, all found in sweatshops:\r\nThese numbers are well below the negligible wage; the minimum wage required for compensation of work is opinionated based on the economies output divided by the number of working and non-working people. In fact it is ofttimes argued that the minimum wage determined in the U.S isn’t enough for most individu als to survive independently on, oddly single parents. In addition to that, sweatshops fail to stand their workers on time for their labor if they pay them at all. Cheap labor is just one of the violating aspects of human rights that takes place in sweatshops.\r\nAlong with not being properly compensated for the amount of labor the workers produce they also work long excruciating hours. Some workers may work anywhere from eighteen to cardinal hour shifts consecutively under unfounded conditions, without breaks for aliment or water. They work extremely long hours in order to make a wage that isn’t sufficient enough to live on. â€Å"Workers work long hours in which they aren’t compensated for, under vulnerable living conditions, and women are often sexually harry”, there isn’t a single symptomatic of a sweatshop that is safe or complies with labor laws and regulations. (Snyder, 1991)\r\nWomen and children often make up majority of these sweatshop employees; it’s hard to imagine an adult working sixteen hours under unsafe conditions but sweatshop managers tire out’t deal out these children any differently, nor do they arrangement any sympathy. Women are often sexually assaulted, abused, not paid for their labor, and in many instances stripped of their employee status and forced into servitude. â€Å"Lured by recruiters who promise wonderful opportunities in foreign lands, young women often pay thousands of dollars in recruitment and accept”; after being taken advantage of these women end up working for low wages in order to pay back these huge debts, whence they become property until they can escape or pay off all the debt, both are highly unlikely (Snyder 1991). Women are treated as if they aren’t human beings, for example: â€Å"In some Indonesian sweatshops, women were forced to take down their bloomers and reveal to manufactory doctors that they were menstruating in order to cite their legal right to menstrual-leave” (Morey, 2000).\r\nWhen discussing the cheap labor constancy tierce world countries often come to heading but these same things occur right here in the U.S, ” The Department of Labor indicates that 50% of adorn factories in the U.S. violate two or more basic labor laws, establishing them as sweatshops”; sweatshops exist when individuals who jargoon stand up for themselves retain their rights taken advantage of (Morey 2000).\r\nThe Violators\r\nNot many people are conscious(predicate) of just how many of our every day items are produced by cheap labor. If one were to take a look around their home they’d be astonished by just how many objects come from sweatshops; there are factories for clothing, technology, furniture and other items that you would neer expect.\r\nNike is what comes to mind starting time when the topic of sweatshop labor is at hand; mainly due to their being accused of producing their shoes and shoes u nder the air Jordan line in China. Nike claims that all of their factories employees compensation complies with the U.S labor laws and any individual who is interested is welcome to visit any Nike manufacturing shop, however this has yet to march on and their has been no footage released of their factories. Nike doesn’t own any of its accused sweatshop factories, they pay factory owners and those owners are responsible for paying the workers their wages, not Nike. legion(predicate) say this is just a loophole to escape labor laws in order save money. When the founder of Nike Phil gentle was asked, â€Å"why doesn’t Nike start its own factories in the U.S” he replied: â€Å" I honestly believe that U.S citizens don’t want to make shoes, they don’t want to do that job” (Jilani, 2011). It’s quite an obvious that Nike isn’t interested in the people, Phil dub and he collogues are strictly boil downed on maximizing the companie s net income, even if that means sacrificing the rights of workers and brief up the opportunity to produce more jobs right here in the U.S. however Nike is the only acquainted(predicate) household name that has suffered from sweatshop accusations.\r\nSix years subsequent technologies peoples champion apple still carries the negative reproach from its labor law violations in its sub-contracted factories. â€Å"More than half of the audits revealed problems, including employees regularly working more than 60 hours a week, underage workers, falsified records, wages below minimum levels, pay withheld as punishment and improper disposal of hazardous waste” (Walters, 2012). The wages and long hours was the least of orchard apple trees worries; workers were vile from severely swollen legs to the point where they could barely walk, being exposed to poisonous chemicals & factory explosions, some were even killed do to these conditions (Walters, 2012). Although Apple receive d much criticism for producing it’s products in sweatshops under these conditions in some manner over the past six years they have managed to become the leader in technology, outselling all competitors. Apple’s ITunes is also the largest music retailor in the U.S, followed by Wal-Mart whom is also been accused . This goes to record that this subject isn’t taken serious enough; if so the acquire of Apple products would have drastically decreased. Here is a chart of Apple’s yearly wampum since the unveiling of their sweatshop production (Powell, 2011):\r\nIf people continue to show that they aren’t concerned with how the products they purchase are produced then companies will continue to manufacture their products by these savage means. It’s almost as if these companies need to be taught a lesson, show them that cheap labor is out of the question by not purchasing their goods and they will diverseness their manners. There is no reason why Apple should have flourished in such a way after being exposed for its production rules.\r\nSweatshops meat On the Economy\r\nSome Economists feel that without sweatshops many of these workers who are now employed in third world countries would be without work and consequently be worse off then they are working for low wages; â€Å"We find that most sweatshop jobs provide an above average standard of living for their workers” (Powell & Sharbek, 2004). Hypothetically speaking, if one were to assume that this is correct and the standard of living is above average this still doesn’t justify the treatment and conditions these workers endure. Just because an individual has no other choice doesn’t give anyone chuck up the sponge reign to destroy all regard for their rights. Cambodia for example has nothing to offer economically, so sweatshops are one of the only choices for many of it’s natives; this wouldn’t be a problem if workers rights wer e respected and at least received a reasonable wage for the amount of work produced. This would be a great solution to the problem, without prostituteing company’s production, without violating workers rights, and without disrupting the economy whatsoever.\r\n contingent Solutions to the Issue\r\nWhen it comes to the task of stopping sweatshops, cheap labor, and exploitation there are two major methods that can be taken. The first and the most unlikely method to succeed is to place the responsibility on the third world countries economy; second would be for people to refuse to purchase goods or products that have anything to do with sweatshop labor. â€Å"Take the attention off of the low-wage assembly jobs and focus on higher valued jobs and comparative advantages” (Farrell & Paron, 2005); this is a great proposition but we have to take into consideration the likelihood of this happening. We can’t expect third world countries to completely lower their bas ic means of employment because it is unrighteous or violates rights. This is why many economists say that sweatshops provide a better income and living to many individuals who otherwise would be unemployed; however there is an alternative method that poses a huge threat to the sweatshop industry.\r\nPeople can perform a number of movements in order to ensure companies start to produce their products the correct way. The first step is for people to demand sweatshop free products where they shop or not to shop there at all. People can also by heart made and second hand products, as well as purchasing fair trade products. The next step is to spread the word and encourage others to do the same until cheap labor is non existent, this wont happen over night but it will show companies that the stigma that comes with producing their products in a sweatshop can ruin business.\r\nConclusion\r\nAlthough over the past decade the use of sweatshop labor by many popular companies has been brough t to the light, there has been no action taken by government, nor have people taken it upon themselves to boycott these companies. The excruciating mickle these individuals work under are hard to behave yet people continue to turn the cheek on the issue. Stopping this ridiculous treatment won’t be easy, but it can be done if people start to take action but caring is where it must start!\r\nWork Cited\r\nSkinner, B. E. (2012, March 30). Slaves put squid on eat tables from south pacific. Retrieved from http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-23/slaves-put-squid-on-u-s-dining-tables-from-\r\nsouth-pacific-catch.html\r\nPowell, B., & Sharbek, D. (2004). Sweatshops and third world living standards: Are the jobs worth the sweat?. autarkical Institute , working paper number 53, 1-15. Retrieved from http://www.independent.org/pdf/working_papers/53_sweatshop.pdf\r\nSnyder, J. (1991). Exploitation and sweatshop labor: Perspectives and issues. concern ethical motive Quarterly,\r\ n20(2), 187-213.\r\nKristof, N. (2009, January 15). Where sweatshops are a dream. The New York Times, p. 35.\r\nBallinger, J. (2009). Finding an anti-sweatshop strategy that works. Dissent , 56(3), 5-8.\r\nSmit, B. (2011). Trafficking in human beings for labour exploitation. the case of the Netherlands. Trends in\r\n nonionic Crime , 14(2/3), 184-197.\r\nFarrell, D., Paron , A., & Reemes, J. (2005). Beyond cheap\r\nlabor: Lessons for developing economies. McKinsey\r\nQuarterly , 1(1), 98-109.\r\nPowell, B. (2011). The end of cheap labor in china. Time ,\r\n177(26), 1-4.\r\nArnold, D., and N. Bowie. 2003. â€Å"Sweatshops and Respect for Persons,” Business Ethics Quarterly 13(2): 221-42.\r\nArnold, D., and P. Hartman. 2003. â€Å"Moral Imagination and the Future of Sweatshops,” Business and Society Review 108(4): 425-61.\r\nsweatshop. (n.d.). Collins English Dictionary †Complete & Unabridged 10th Edition. Retrieved April 24, 2012, from Dictionary.com websit e: http://dictionary.reference.com/ cut back/sweatshop\r\nDOL. (2009, September). Wages and hours worked:\r\nMinimum wage and overtime pay. Retrieved from http://www.dol.gov/elaws/elg/minwage.htm\r\nWoolf, L. (2011). women and global human rights.\r\nRetrieved from http://www.webster.edu/~woolflm/sweatshops.html\r\nWoolf, L. (2011). women and global human rights.\r\nRetrieved from http://www.webster.edu/~woolflm/sweatshops.html\r\nJilani, Z. (2011, July 13). Thinking progress. Retrieved from http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2011/07/13/267520/nike-workers-humiliation/\r\nWalters, S. (2012, February 4). Apple still shamed by\r\nchina [Web log message]. Retrieved from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2096551/Apple-shamed-Chinas-iPod-sweatshops_\r\nSIX-YEARS-expos.html\r\n'