Middle Ages vs Renaissance Essay -- European Renaissance Essays

Life during the middle ages (1066-1485) was dictated by how much money you had. Were you a noble? Or were you a peasant. Your feel of life was in direct proportion to your status. Lords of the Noble class govern territories, also kn accept as villages. These villages mainly consisted of one room houses, with peradventure a church and a blacksmith shop. Peasants or serfs lived in these villages and worked under utter Lord. Daily life was all about survival. The days were spent put and growing food, harvesting the crop, sewing clothes, and making any supplies that were needed to survive. business between different villages was something that was only done as a put out resort. People in each village worked together to make their own village successful. Life also depended on what kind of Lord you had. If he was a fair Lord, they were treated reasonably well, and didnt suffer. As ache as the crop was good, they would have plenty to eat, and work was shared equally. If he was an unjust Lord the villagers were undecided to his whims. If he demanded money or harvest-tide from them they must give it, whether it would hurt their own survival or non. Likewise, if he was a Lord that liked to pick fights with neighboring Lords, the villagers would be subject to pillage and plunder by the other Lords that were trying to get impale at their particular Lord. Any revenge sought out against a Lord by another Lord would mean that the people of verbalise Lords village paid the price. Crops would be destroyed, houses burned and sometimes the villagers were killed. This was known as the Feudal System. The Feudal System was based on the rights of the Nobles, not the serfs. Nobles had preferred seating in the churches, and special hunting privileges. They h... ...done. Giotto use tempera to paint this one. There are senses of desperation of the apostles, save it is not as compelling or moving as Leonardos. Giotto has saucy colors, especially consideri ng the era it was painted in. However, he doesnt use landscape, there is no symmetry. When you look at it, you can tell who Christ is referable to the golden halo around his head. However to decipher which one of the apostles is Judas, would be in vain. He used no symbolism, there is no depth. The scene is done in a golden hue, not a indwelling life like version. The faces of the apostles do show a questioning gaze, but the diverse emotions are not there. Everyone is also sitting straight up around a table, there is no movement. I would have to put that while for its era this was a great painting, it is not a memorable one for me. Leonardos version is so much more.