Gender Differences In Aspects Of English Language Use

Gender Differences In Aspects Of side of meat Language UseLanguage is largely influenced by socialization, shaped by conditioning and constant reinforce workforcet. When p arnts speak to children they address boys and girls in different ways. In general, girls argon treated to a greater extent gently and spoken to to a greater extent softly. Boys ar encouraged to play roughly, to make a noise and to be expressive, hardly not to cry. Girls atomic number 18 encouraged to be less(prenominal) rowdy and whitethorn cry but not shout. They be discouraged from expressing anger.For boys, behavioural expectations be reinforced with expressions like You throw like a girl, and Big boys dont cry. As children develop, these differences begin to furnish to a greater extent clearly in language. They become fall in of the communication style that is there for life. According to Mayor, B (1996, foliate 64), as they mature girls and boys increasingly differentiate their language use to refl ect their sexual urge roles. Girls use much indirect language than boys, and are more(prenominal) presumable to modify their speech styles in varying place settings.Studies of childrens play behaviour abut that boys are competitive and confrontational, and concentrate on the physical world, whereas girls are indirect, cooperative and are interested in motives and feelings. (Maybin, 1996 summon 19). Generally speaking, boys and men are assertive, independent and objective. Girls and women are submissive, dependent and subjective. Of course, there is a wide spue of communication styles and practices within each sexuality group, with most men and women exploitation various conversation styles depending on the purpose and context, and overly whether they are in single sex groups.In mixed company women usually verbalize less than men, and are more polite. They are less competitive and find out to bring others into the conversation. This could be because women are brought up to be deferential to men. They are more hesitant and indirect, use more tag questions (isnt it? dont you think?), more polite forms (could you possibly?) and generally weaker vocabulary (words like lovely and Oh dear). (Maybin, 1996 varlet 19).Men on the other hand, interrupt more and give less feedback and support. In situations that require formal conversation, such as at conferences, task meetings, or other mixed-gender gatherings, men melt down to initiate more of the interaction. Those who talk of the town most are perceived to be leaders. (Coates, 1998, p.469).Amongst themselves, women tend to talk more. They show more concern for the relational aspects of conversation. In exclusively male groups, men tend to focus more on activities than on conversation (Coates, 1998, p.216).Of course, these are generalised descriptions of behaviour, and some(prenominal) sexes are able to modify their styles depending on the context. Maybin (1996, rogue 19) quotes a study of courtroom language in which high-status, expert pistillate witnesses utilize masculine speaking styles, whilst lower status male witnesses used pistillate style features.Dr. John Gray (author of Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus) says that women communicate for different reasons than men do. When men talk round problems, they are looking for solutions, whereas when women discuss problems they are sharing their feelings, because they find this therapeutic. In this context what women would like from men is empathy, and not solutions.The table on the following page shows clear differences in communication styles between men and women.MenWomen They canvass to solve problems and troubles They emphasize to match troubles by relating similar negative experiences They sire a more analytical approach to problems They cede a more emotional approach to problems They are less promising to ask for help. They try to figure things out on their own They are more likely to ask for help and acce pt it They are more task-oriented (i.e., What is everyone going to do?) They are more maintenance-oriented (i.e., Is everyone all right?) They appear less a priori and less aware of details They appear more intuitive and more aware of details They have more difficulty in expressing suggest feelings They have less difficulty in expressing intimate feelings They are more apt to yell, shout and swear to release anger They are more apt to cry to release anger They talk more about what they did, where they went and less about relationships with others They talk more about how they feel and more about relationships with others They tend to take verbal rejection less personally They tend to take verbal rejection more personally(Glass, L. (1995) page 49).English has a cancel gender, unlike many other languages. (Of course, it was not eer so before 1154, Old English nouns still used the Anglo-Saxon derived genders. (Bryson, B, 1990, page 49)). This means that words like woman, cow, ewe, a re feminine because of their biological sex. In the same way, bull, boy and tomcat are masculine. This natural gender refers still to animals and not to objects. Historically, certain professions acquired genders doctors, lawyers, politicians, engineers, architects and ministers were invariably male. Nurses, nannies and typists tended to be female. Nowadays, all of these professions are properly gender-free. There are overly words with male endings such as chairman, postman and fireman, which now have alternatives chairperson, postal worker and fire-fighter. Regarding creative writing, women authors have tended to be under represented in most selections of literary texts. Writers such as the Bront sisters and Mary Anne Evans had to adopt male noms de plume (respectively Currer, Ellis and Acton Bell, and George Elliot) even to observe published. Apart from this gender based discrimination, there is also a loyal feeling amongst many writers that the written, literary language its elf was for so long a male preserve, that woman writers need their own idiom. In Thomas Hardys outlying(prenominal) from the Madding Crowd, the heroine Bathsheba explains that It is difficult for a woman to define her feelings in language which is primarily made by men to express theirs (Quoted in Menham, R. 1995, page 136). Menham also quotes from Virginia Wolf, who appeals for a new kind of writing that will take the natural shape of a womans thought without crushing or distorting it. In A room of Ones Own she says that the resources of the English language would be much vomit to the stretch, and whole flights of words would need to wing their way illegitimately into humankind in order for female sensibility to be adequately explored. She also associates maleness with a sterile rationalism and the aims of control and regulation, and femaleness with a fertile indiscipline, spontaneity, plenitude, a creative irrationalism. (Menham, R (1995) page 137).Referring to the work of Fren ch theorist Hlne Cixous, Menham feels that her celebration of womans writing effect a great historical reversal of the traditional strengths and weaknesses of male and female language-use. It gives a positive value to precisely those qualities that men have always derogated in women hysteria, lack of force, sensitivity. (Menham, R (1995) page 138.)In conclusion, there is no doubt that there are differences in English language use, both in speech and writing, based on gender. Most of these seem to be as a result of socialisation from an early age.The different, traditional gender roles and expectations coloured the way children were raised and educated, and in many respects these influences are still in place. Hope in effect(p)y, as modern societies eliminate the largely staged stereotypes of gender based roles and behaviours, we will all be able to experience, and articulate, the full panoply of human emotional and intellectual experience, regardless of gender.